Oct 29, 2006, 12:53 AM // 00:53
|
#1
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ministry of Love
Profession: W/Mo
|
HvH needs ranking
Hero vs Hero desperatly needs a ranking system so that players of relative skill are paired against each other.
Heres what I propose.
Everyone starts with 1200 points.
When you first start, you are a "provisonal" player.
You must fight through 10 matches to loose provisonal, during this time you win and loose rank points, neither you or your opponent may see your actual rank points during this time. During this time, you only fight other provisional players.
Winning and loosing points.
Winning a match gives you +Z
Loosing gives you - Z
Z = (X - Y) /2
Where X equals Player A's rank
Y equals Player B's rank
Basically, you win half the diffrence in rank between you and your opponet.
If X = Y
Then Z = 10
This will allow the match maker to more precisely pair up players based on thier rank points. Obs mode can also display the top ranked matches.
As there is a possiblity that some players will loose points until they reach 0. A Npc should be created in the Great Temple of Balth who basically "resets" your HvH status back to 1200.
Note: Upon resetting back to 1200, becoming provisional again would need to be decided by anet. On one hand, you would be going into a "newbie" area fully experienced. On the other, if players that reset were to become provisional again it would keep the number of provisional players up so that true new players will have players to fight against. This needs to be figured out by someone other than me
Discuss...
|
|
|
Oct 29, 2006, 12:59 AM // 00:59
|
#2
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Guild: Cookie Cutter [FTW]
|
I am signed for the idea of ranking system for HvH, it does not however, in my opinion, have to be so complex
|
|
|
Oct 29, 2006, 01:04 AM // 01:04
|
#3
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ministry of Love
Profession: W/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by unmatchedfury
I am signed for the idea of ranking system for HvH, it does not however, in my opinion, have to be so complex
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system
That is a complex system.
Quote:
R_A^\prime = R_A + K(S_A - E_A).
|
My system is much much simpler.
|
|
|
Oct 29, 2006, 01:17 AM // 01:17
|
#4
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
|
I'm all for the idea of a ranked HvH system, but I don't think yours is the greatest tbh. The better the opponent that beats you, the more you are punished?
|
|
|
Oct 29, 2006, 01:35 AM // 01:35
|
#5
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Apr 2006
Guild: Creating guild
Profession: Mo/
|
well he only had half of it I think
It should be more like you have score Player A (lowerrank) Player B (Higher rank)
If A wins then A gets +z and B gets -z
However if B wins, somehow it would have to relate to inverse z
Like have a constant made x and...
B gets + X/z and A gets -x/z
This doesn't exactly work tho
But I don't see why Elo would not work, Yahoo games can run Elo ranks lol I don't see why guild wars couldn't
Note: scratch that the Z thingy won't even work period. If A = 1200 and B = 1200 then they go +-10 according to above. If A =1198 and B= 1200 then they only go +- 1, even tho they are further apart.
Last edited by Not A Fifty Five; Oct 29, 2006 at 01:49 AM // 01:49..
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24 PM // 12:24.
|